## Re: OG chatrooms

[ Follow-Ups ] [ Post Follow-up ] [ Bulletin Board ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by jeaca on December 23, 1999 at 07:04:24: In Reply to: Re: OG chatrooms posted by angel on December 23, 1999 at 07:03:00:

:
: : : Wrong. The IRC networks where you can really own a channel (dalnet, etc.) give
: : : you the possibility to own the channel *ON SERVER BASIS*. Let me explain how:
: : : If you join a channel that is not owned by someone else, it behaves like
: : : you would normally expect, you get operator status as you're the first
: : : one. Now, you can send a 'REGISTER' command to Chanserv (or whatever it's

: : Same applies for instance to UnderNet.

: : There you do not even need a to have a bot to protect
: : your channel, you can let X or Y (which are server bots
: : which are part of the network and can't even be /kill'ed)
: : join your channel and protect it for you.

: : Regards,
: : Midnight

Follow-up Messages:

- Re: OG chatrooms scherrie 07:08:13 12/23/99 (1)
  - Re: OG chatrooms Hero 19:36:20 1/29/2000 (0)

Post a Follow-up Message

    Name:

    E-Mail:

    Subject:
    Comments:

    :
    : :
    : : : : Wrong. The IRC networks where you can really own a channel (dalnet, etc.) give
    : : : : you the possibility to own the channel *ON SERVER BASIS*. Let me explain how:
    : : : : If you join a channel that is not owned by someone else, it behaves like
    : : : : you would normally expect, you get operator status as you're the first
    : : : : one. Now, you can send a 'REGISTER' command to Chanserv (or whatever it's

    : : : Same applies for instance to UnderNet.

    : : : There you do not even need a to have a bot to protect
    : : : your channel, you can let X or Y (which are server bots
    : : : which are part of the network and can't even be /kill'ed)
    : : : join your channel and protect it for you.

    : : : Regards,
    : : : Midnight

    Optional Link URL:

    Link Title:

    Optional Image URL:

[ Follow-Ups ] [ Post Follow-up ] [ Bulletin Board ] [ FAQ ]